Do you know who Steve Reifman is?
He is an amazing teacher, author and speaker. I actually came across
him on Twitter. I was looking through his website and I loved his
articles. I think they are so true. I am so happy to be able to share
one of his articles with you. I love this article because I do always
struggle with how much help do I give my kindergarteners. I don't want
to give too much help that they aren't learning anything, but on the
other hand I don't want to not give enough help that they aren't
learning anything either. Please read his article below and comment
your thoughts about it. Also make sure you check out his website. Thanks Steve for letting me share this with my readers.
Providing Assistance that Empowers Kids (The Bench Press Analogy)
When
helping students with their math activities and other academic work, it
is often difficult for teachers and parents to know how much assistance
to provide. If we don’t offer enough support, students’ struggles are
likely to continue, and kids may become frustrated and discouraged. They
may even shut down. On the other hand, if we provide too much
assistance, students may complete their work successfully, but, in the
process, we may deny them opportunities to think for themselves and
develop as independent thinkers and problem-solvers.
In
these situations I think about a comparable situation that happens in
gyms all the time when people are lifting weights. Specifically, I think
about the bench press exercise in which people lie on their backs on a
flat bench and attempt to push a barbell from their chests into the air
for a certain number of repetitions.
Imagine my friend,
Mark, is trying to bench press 20 pounds ten times. Because the weight
is so light, he can easily complete the set on his own. When the amount
of weight increases, however, Mark needs me to spot for him so that the
barbell doesn’t remain on his chest when he reaches the point of muscle
failure.
Assume that when trying to bench press 185
pounds, Mark’s goal is to complete eight repetitions. He finishes the
first six reps on his own, yet struggles halfway through his seventh. I
am standing behind him the entire time with my hands underneath the bar,
ready to assist. In this situation I have a choice to make, and I
basically have three options. First, I can do nothing, but if I choose
this approach, the barbell will come down on his chest, an injury is
likely to occur, and our friendship will probably end.
On
the other hand, I can take over completely and finish the rep for him.
If I simply grab the bar at the first sign of struggle and return it to
the weight rack on my own, I ensure his safety, but I have done nothing
to help him improve his strength. As a result, the next time he bench
presses, there is no reason to expect that he will be able to lift
anymore weight than he did this time.
The best approach
in this situation is for me to put my hands under the barbell and do as
little work as possible to help him keep the bar moving. If he’s able to
do most of the work himself, my effort will be very gentle. If his
struggle increases, I will assume more of the workload. I will continue
to adjust the amount of assistance I provide based on the amount of work
Mark is able to do for himself.
If he only needs a
small amount of assistance on the seventh rep, he may choose to try for
an eighth, and on that rep I will probably have to increase the amount
of support I provide. The strength gains that this set produces occur
mostly in these final two reps, not the first six that he could do
independently. My performance as a spotter helps him go beyond what he
could do independently to move to that next level of strength. The next
time he bench presses, he will probably be able to do more of the work
on his own because of the assistance I provided this time around.
These
moments of struggle are crucial growth opportunities, and by carefully
providing just enough guidance to help keep the bar moving, I am
empowering my friend to move beyond his current capacity to a larger
future capacity.
This same idea holds true in the
classroom, and moments of struggle need to be savored as valuable growth
opportunities. As teachers, if we are able to provide just enough
assistance to keep students moving forward, we increase their capacity
for the future. Sometimes that little assistance involves asking the
right question, suggesting an appropriate strategy, offering
encouragement, or reminding students to try an approach that they may
have used successfully in the past. It never means abandoning them, and
it never means telling them what to do.
We simply want to keep the bar moving.
Steve Reifman is a National Board
Certified elementary school teacher, author, and speaker in Santa
Monica, CA. He has written several books for educators and parents,
including Changing Kids� Lives One Quote at a Time and Eight Essentials for Empowered Teaching and Learning, K-8. Steve is also the creator of the Chase Manning Mystery Series
for kids 8-12. Each book in the series features a single-day, real-time
thriller that occurs on an elementary school campus. For weekly
Teaching Tips, blog posts, and other valuable resources and strategies
on teaching the whole child, visit http://stevereifman.com. You can follow Steve on Twitter at http://twitter.com/#!/stevereifman.
Thank you for sharing April! I love the analogy and completely agree!
ReplyDeleteNicole
Rowdy in Room 300
You're welcome!
DeleteApril
Great blog! I'm your newest follower!
ReplyDeleteMaria
Kinder-Craze
Thanks so much on becoming a follower!
DeleteApril